Why Women Walk a Narrower Road to Leadership
A closer look at women leadership and the realities of developing women leaders today

Women’s leadership journeys rarely unfold on a level playing field. While progress is visible, the underlying expectations placed on women leaders continue to shape how ambition is read, how confidence is judged, and how readiness is defined. These forces are subtle, often invisible, and rarely written into policy. Yet they quietly influence who advances, who hesitates, and who is encouraged to step forward. Understanding these dynamics is essential if leadership development is to genuinely support developing women leaders rather than asking them to navigate the same narrow paths more skillfully.
1. Ambition and the Uneven Rules of Women Leadership
Across cultures, women describe an ongoing negotiation with ambition. The desire to grow is present, but what changes is the cost attached to expressing it. Research on role congruity shows that when women signal drive or assertiveness, they face social and professional pushback because ambition clashes with what people assume women should be like (Eagly & Karau, 2002; Rudman & Phelan, 2008). These expectations intensify as seniority increases.
Layered onto this is the cultural ambivalence around women’s ambition. Women who articulate aspiration or career goals clearly often encounter subtle discomfort. Studies show that ambitious women face likability penalties and harsher interpersonal judgments, even when performance remains strong (Rudman & Phelan, 2008). These reactions rarely surface in formal review processes, yet they influence who is encouraged, who is questioned, and who is trusted with opportunity.
Across industries, ambition in men is interpreted as natural and expected. In women, the same ambition can trigger hesitation. This pressure often leads women to manage how much ambition they show publicly. Research highlights that women leaders internalise the anticipation of judgement, calibrating how they speak about aspirations to avoid being seen as excessive or misaligned (Rhode, 2021). Recent analyses of public reactions to women CEOs reflect the same double bind, where women are criticised for being either too ambitious or not ambitious enough (Russell Reynolds Associates, 2025).
As a result, ambition becomes something women pursue strategically, carefully packaged and often delayed. For organisations serious about developing women leaders, this insight is critical. Leadership development must create environments where ambition is recognised as readiness, not risk.
2. The Cost of Being “Acceptable” as a Leader
Be warm, but not too warm. Be visible, but not so visible that it unsettles the room. These contradictions accumulate slowly until many women recognise that the work they do and the behaviour they are expected to perform no longer align.
Research shows that women leaders are evaluated through a narrower, more behaviour focused lens, while men are judged more directly on outcomes (Eagly & Karau, 2002). Behaviours that signal confidence in men are more likely to be labelled assertive, while the same behaviours in women are often perceived as abrasive or difficult.
While men are granted a wider behavioural bandwidth, women operate within a much narrower middle zone. Small shifts in tone, decisiveness, or visibility can be interpreted as signals of threat or likeability. Over time, these micro adjustments influence who speaks first, who is nominated for stretch roles, and whose leadership is seen as ready.
This is why leadership development for women cannot rely on generic models. Career pathways designed with women’s lived realities in mind are essential for sustaining women leadership at scale. InspireOne’s SHINE program focuses on developing women leaders by strengthening executive presence, confidence, and access to experiences that accelerate progression. It supports organisations in redesigning the middle layers of leadership so potential is not stalled by outdated systems.
Careers often lose momentum not because women lack capability, but because systems fail to adapt to the talent already present. When leadership development is rebuilt with intention, women do not just advance, they reshape the leadership landscape itself.
If developing women leaders is a priority for your organisation, explore how SHINE enables leadership development that translates ambition into sustained leadership impact.
References
Catalyst. (2023). Womenin leadership at S&P 500 companies: Quick take. Catalyst.
Eagly, A. H.,& Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward femaleleaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598.
IBM Institute forBusiness Value. (2021). Women, leadership, and missed opportunities: Whyorganizations' progress stalls.
Rhode, D. L.(2021). Women and leadership. Oxford University Press.
Rudman, L. A.,& Phelan, J. E. (2008). Backlash effects for disconfirming genderstereotypes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–79.
Russell ReynoldsAssociates. (2025). Leadership transitions and public perceptions of womenCEOs. Russell Reynolds Associates.
Related Blogs
We believe leadership is a journey, not a destination. That's why we bring you expert-curated knowledge to help you navigate every turn.
Ready to Elevate Your Leadership?
Let’s co-create a leadership journey tailored to your team’s unique goals.





